SVI-NEWS

Your Source For Local and Regional News

Slider

Slider

Featured Wyoming

Business group to lawmakers: No new taxes

By Hannah Black and Carrie Haderlie
Wyoming Tribune Eagle
Via- Wyoming News Exchange

CHEYENNE — As revenue from Wyoming’s natural resources industry continues to wane, state legislators are considering alternative options for funding state services, and at least one business lobbying group is pushing back.

All options, from a gas tax and a gross receipts tax, are on the table as the upcoming budget session looms.

The Joint Transportation, Highways and Military Affairs Interim Committee sponsored and assigned a number to a fuel tax bill, which, as proposed, contains a five cents per year increase on every gallon of gas sold in Wyoming for a period of three years.

“Given the testimony from various interest groups, our committee felt most committed to bringing forth the gas tax option,” Sen. Bill Landen, R-Casper, said in an email to the Wyoming Tribune Eagle Thursday.

The amount of funding generated would cover the state match necessary to take full advantage of federal dollars coming as a result of passage of the infrastructure bill, he said.

Landen, who is chairman of the Transportation Committee, also said the committee forwarded a bill suggesting usage of the 1% diversion of severance taxes currently going to the Permanent Wyoming Mineral Trust Fund as that match.

Revenue generated from a gas tax would also be used to fund highway construction, repair and maintenance, and not for administration or operating expenses.

As proposed, the gas tax would begin at 29 cents per gallon on July 1, 2022, and would increase each year by five cents until it reached 39 cents per gallon.

But according to a recent report from the Wyoming’s National Federation of Independent Business, only 18% of those surveyed believe Wyoming should increase its fuel tax to maintain and replace the state’s highways and bridges. Seventy-three percent of respondents said they did not support a fuel tax.

The NFIB represents about 2,700 businesses in Wyoming, according to Tony Gagliardi, the statewide director. Gagliardi said he did not know immediately what proportion took part in the survey, but that it did require a 5% return rate before results were made public.

When asked if Wyoming’s Equal Pay law limit on employers’ policies should prohibit employees from discussing their pay with one another, 70% responded in the negative, and the survey found an 82% favorable response rate when asked if customers and repair shops should be able to access necessary information from manufacturers to repair their products.

The survey showed a 97% opposition to a possible Wyoming gross receipts tax, without a single “yes” vote on that question, Gagliardi said.

“This is probably the worst time in history to be looking at new taxes, when businesses are now, by a thread, starting to recover,” Gagliardi said.

But according to at least one legislator on the Joint Revenue Committee, Wyoming is changing.

“We have had a great run on coal and oil and gas, and it has been really fabulous. We built new schools all across the state with the coal money, we have built new roads,” Sen. Cale Case, R-Lander, said. “But that money is going away. The mineral industry that used to support more than 70% of the expenditures of the state is shrinking rapidly.”

Case said that as Wyoming faces more federal restrictions on oil and gas production, the budget pinch will just get tighter. As such, the Revenue Committee was tasked with looking at all options for supporting state government during the interim.

“People need to have schools, we need to have roads,” Case said. “We have to have law enforcement services. You just tick down the list.”

Historically, Wyoming has not had to impose taxes on its citizens like a gas tax, an income tax or a gross receipts tax, but that has also meant most everyone in Wyoming “was not paying their way,” Case said.

“In Wyoming, nobody really pays their own way except the mineral industry,” he said.

Many people are simply not used to the idea of any of the taxes under consideration, even though neighboring states like South Dakota have much higher taxes in some cases – including property taxes three times as high as Wyoming’s, that fund its school system.

The NFIB said that with $1 billion in American Rescue Plan Act funds to spend, and “flush state coffers, small-business owners ask why” these taxes are even under consideration. Case said that question fails to take the long view.

“There is this malaise about the money coming out of Washington, and the APRA funding, but that is not going to last forever,” Case said. “That is maybe a couple of years, and if we aren’t allowed to produce more oil and gas, then we are going to be in a real fiscal crunch. The question is, how do we prepare for that? We have to explore other sources of revenue.”

Rep. Mike Yin, D-Jackson, also a member of the Revenue Committee, said a gross receipts tax is something that most other states have on the books.

When a gross receipts tax is applied by large-scale retailers like Walmart, which employ across-the-board pricing in all stores nationwide, Wyoming residents are already paying a tax that benefits others states’ coffers. A gross receipts tax in Wyoming may raise nationwide prices at a retailer like Walmart, but a portion of that revenue would then come back to Wyoming.

“Walmart prices include all taxes that aren’t sales taxes, so any corporate tax or gross receipts tax gets priced on their products,” Yin said. “A gross receipts tax would be to ensure Wyoming gets the benefit of that tax, which is built into the price and paid by every consumer, regardless of what state they are in.”

The Revenue Committee has not yet sponsored legislation to create a gross receipts tax, and will likely revisit the issue this spring after the budget session has ended, Yin said.

But everyone in Wyoming needs to be thinking about how to pay their way now that natural resource revenue is fading, Case said.

“This is about getting everybody to have their oars in the water. That is one thing we have not done in Wyoming,” Case said. “It was a great ride, but we have to be realistic.

“There is this knee-jerk reaction from this respected business group, and nothing against them. But really, if you ask anybody, they will say they don’t want to pay more taxes,” Case continued. “But if you say, ‘How would you like to support our schools? What is your preferred way?’ it is a different question.”

Let us know what you think!
+1
1
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
+1
0
Share